{"id":5905,"date":"2013-12-01T14:01:43","date_gmt":"2013-12-01T20:01:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/oilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association\/"},"modified":"2013-12-01T14:01:43","modified_gmt":"2013-12-01T20:01:43","slug":"oilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/oilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association\/","title":{"rendered":"Oilfield Litigation, Texas Trial Lawyers Association"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><a name=\"_Toc373847373\"><\/a>I. SCOPE OF PAPER<\/h2>\n<p>This paper attempts to summarize recent case law developments with significance in the area of oilfield litigation.\u00a0 Special problems and resources to consider are also included.<\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc373847374\"><\/a>II. BASIC DOCUMENTS; MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND DRILLING CONTRACTS<\/h2>\n<p>The Master Service Agreement is typically entered into between larger entities, and covers a number of operations throughout the United States.\u00a0 There is much litigation construing sections of the Master Service Agreement, which can entail risk-shifting agreements, waivers of workers\u2019 compensation subrogation rights, limits on the rights of control, and a number of other issues.\u00a0 See, for example, Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co., 132 S.W.3d 90, 92 (Tex. App.\u2014Houston [14th Dist., no pet.] 2004).\u00a0 You may wish to review the Master Service Agreement and read it with an eye toward the issues which are developing in your case.\u00a0 As Master Service Agreements change from time-to-time, you may wish to obtain copies of the Master Service Agreement from all parties subject to the Agreement to make sure that there are no material changes among the various versions in circulation.<\/p>\n<p>Drilling contracts come in different forms including \u201cTurnkey,\u201d \u201cDay Work,\u201d\u00a0 \u201cFootage,\u201d and a few other variations.\u00a0 The most common examples of these contracts are contained in various International Association of Drilling Contractor (IADC) forms.\u00a0 \u201cTurnkey\u201d drilling is an oilfield term for drilling a well for a fixed price.\u00a0 Much of the risk is allocated to the driller, as it is responsible for reaching a certain depth\/formation regardless of the time and resources spent on the effort.\u00a0 \u201cDay Work\u201d contracts and \u201cFootage\u201d contracts, on the other hand, typically allocate much of the risk to the developer of the well, as it can be in more control of the pace of drilling and activities involved in drilling.\u00a0 Again, both \u201cTurnkey\u201d and \u201cDay Work\u201d contracts have been discussed in published case law and are probably worth reviewing in any oilfield litigation relating to drilling.\u00a0 A good description of the differences in these different drilling contracts are found in Mohican Oil &amp; Gas, LLC v. Scorpion Exploration &amp; Production, Inc., 337 S.W.3d 310 (Tex. App.\u2014Corpus Christi 2011, no pet.)\u00a0and Melvin Green, Inc. v. Questor Drilling Corp., 946 S.W.2d 907 (Tex. App.\u2014Amarillo 1997, pet. denied).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a name=\"_Toc373847375\"><\/a> INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Many Master Service Agreements contain indemnity agreements \u2014 some are found in pre-printed form; others are added by lawyers working for one or both of the parties.\u00a0 The indemnity provisions must be carefully read and understood, especially in light of Texas Civil Practice &amp; Remedies Code, \u00a7\u00a7127-001-007, the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Statue.<\/p>\n<p>The Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Statute arises in many contexts.\u00a0 For instance, in Ex-Pro Americus, LLC v. Sanguine Exploration, LLC, 351 S.W.3d 915 (Houston App.\u201414th Dist. 2011, pet. dismissed<\/p>\n<p>) \u2013 Sanguine operated an oil and gas lease, and its contractor hired Ex-Pro to perform downhole services.\u00a0 Once the services had been provided, and Ex-Pro gave Sanguine\u2019s contractor a ticket which included an indemnity agreement by which the parties agreed to indemnify each other and procure insurance.\u00a0 Sometime later, Ex-Pro was named as a defendant in a lawsuit for a fatal incident which occurred at the wellsite.\u00a0 Ex Pro demanded indemnity from Sanguine.\u00a0 Both sides sought summary judgment.\u00a0 The Court of Appeals reversed the partial summary judgments below and held that issues of conspicuity and authority\/apparent authority precluded summary judgment.<\/p>\n<p>For the interplay between the Texas Workers\u2019 Compensation system and the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act, consider Energy Service Co. of Bowie, Inc. v. Superior Snubbing Services, Inc., 236 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. 2007).\u00a0 Energy Service Co. and Superior Snubbing both provided services for Mitchell Energy Corporation, and each signed agreements with Mitchell which included indemnity agreements.\u00a0 Each party agreed to support its obligation with liability insurance so that, to the extent of coverage, the indemnification obligations would not be voided by Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act.\u00a0 Superior Snubbing\u2019s employee sued Mitchell and Energy Service Co. for injuries he suffered while working at a Mitchell site.\u00a0 Energy Service Co. settled with the Superior employee, and then sued Superior on the indemnity agreement.\u00a0 \u00a0Superior claimed that because it was covered by a workers\u2019 compensation policy, Energy\u2019s claim was barred by Section 417.004 of the Labor Code.\u00a0 The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment for Energy.\u00a0 The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment for Superior. \u00a0On appeal to the Supreme Court, Superior argued that a contractor working in the oilfield should not be economically pressured into surrendering its statutory immunity from liability for indemnity of an employee\u2019s personal injury claims.\u00a0 The court held that the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act was not overridden by amendments to the Workers\u2019 Compensation Act of 1989.<\/p>\n<p>A complication caused by an insurance carrier\u2019s insolvency was the subject of Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co., 132 S.W.3d 90 (Tex. App.\u2014Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet).\u00a0 Abraxas hired Pool to perform work on its oil and gas lease.\u00a0 The agreement between Abraxas and Pool contained an indemnity clause by which the parties agreed to indemnify one another for claims arising from the death or injury of their employees.\u00a0 The parties also agreed to acquire and maintain adequate insurance consistent with the Safe Harbor provisions of the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act.\u00a0 A Pool employee was fatally injured at the drilling site, and his estate file suit against Abraxas which in turn demanded defense and indemnity from Pool.\u00a0 Pool\u2019s insurance carrier agreed to indemnify Abraxas and later agreed to settle the case.\u00a0 Unfortunately, the insurance carrier became insolvent before the case was funded.\u00a0 Pool itself contributed $1,000,000.00 to settle the case post-insolvency and sought reimbursement from Abraxas\u2019 insurance carrier, Northfield.\u00a0 After another lawsuit, summary judgment was granted against Pool on its claim that the Anti-Indemnity statute applied.\u00a0 The court of appeals affirmed the summary judgment, holding that Pool\u2019s indemnity obligations were not altered because of the insolvency; Abraxas and its carrier were not required to reimburse Pool for the money paid to settle the underlying claim.<\/p>\n<h2><a href=\"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Oilfield-Litigation-Texas-Trial-Lawyers-Association-George-Tex-Quesada-December-2013.pdf\">Download and read the entire publication here.<\/a><\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I. SCOPE OF PAPER This paper attempts to summarize recent case law developments with significance in the area of oilfield litigation.\u00a0 Special problems and resources to consider are also included. II. BASIC DOCUMENTS; MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND DRILLING CONTRACTS The Master Service Agreement is typically entered into between larger entities, and covers a number of<br \/><a class=\"button read-more news-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/oilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association\/\">LEER M\u00c1S<\/a><\/p>\n<div class='heateorSssClear'><\/div><div style=\"float: right\" class='heateor_sss_sharing_container heateor_sss_horizontal_sharing' heateor-sss-data-href='https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/oilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association\/'><div class='heateor_sss_sharing_title' style=\"font-weight:bold\" ><\/div><ul  class=\"heateor_sss_sharing_ul\"><li class=\"heateorSssSharingRound\"><i style=\"width:35px;height:35px;border-radius:999px;\" alt=\"Facebook\" Title=\"Facebook\" class=\"heateorSssSharing heateorSssFacebookBackground\" onclick='heateorSssPopup(\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.textrial.com%2Fes%2Foilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association%2F\")'><ss style=\"display:block;border-radius:999px;\" class=\"heateorSssSharingSvg heateorSssFacebookSvg\"><\/ss><\/i><\/li><li class=\"heateorSssSharingRound\"><i style=\"width:35px;height:35px;border-radius:999px;\" alt=\"Linkedin\" Title=\"Linkedin\" class=\"heateorSssSharing heateorSssLinkedinBackground\" onclick='heateorSssPopup(\"http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.textrial.com%2Fes%2Foilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association%2F&title=Oilfield%20Litigation%2C%20Texas%20Trial%20Lawyers%20Association\")'><ss style=\"display:block;border-radius:999px;\" class=\"heateorSssSharingSvg heateorSssLinkedinSvg\"><\/ss><\/i><\/li><li class=\"heateorSssSharingRound\"><i style=\"width:35px;height:35px;border-radius:999px;\" alt=\"Twitter\" Title=\"Twitter\" class=\"heateorSssSharing heateorSssTwitterBackground\" onclick='heateorSssPopup(\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Oilfield%20Litigation%2C%20Texas%20Trial%20Lawyers%20Association&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.textrial.com%2Fes%2Foilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association%2F\")'><ss style=\"display:block;border-radius:999px;\" class=\"heateorSssSharingSvg heateorSssTwitterSvg\"><\/ss><\/i><\/li><li class=\"heateorSssSharingRound\"><i style=\"width:35px;height:35px;border-radius:999px;\" alt=\"Instagram\" Title=\"Instagram\" class=\"heateorSssSharing heateorSssInstagramBackground\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><ss style=\"display:block;border-radius:999px;\" class=\"heateorSssSharingSvg heateorSssInstagramSvg\"><\/ss><\/a><\/i><\/li><li class=\"heateorSssSharingRound\"><i style=\"width:35px;height:35px;border-radius:999px;\" alt=\"Email\" Title=\"Email\" class=\"heateorSssSharing heateorSssEmailBackground\"  onclick=\"window.location.href = 'mailto:?subject=' + decodeURIComponent('Oilfield%20Litigation%2C%20Texas%20Trial%20Lawyers%20Association' ).replace('&', '%26') + '&body=' + decodeURIComponent('https%3A%2F%2Fwww.textrial.com%2Fes%2Foilfield-litigation-texas-trial-lawyers-association%2F' )\"><ss style=\"display:block\" class=\"heateorSssSharingSvg heateorSssEmailSvg\"><\/ss><\/i><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"heateorSssClear\"><\/div><\/div><div class='heateorSssClear'><\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[263],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-5905","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-publications-es-2","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5905\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post\/"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1\/"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments\/?post=5905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5905\/revisions\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=5905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/?post=5905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.textrial.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags\/?post=5905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}